urlkiller |
|
---|---|
when iam developing skins or plugins for sed i needed to change the favicon every time.
so my idea was why not sticking the favicon in the skin folder. i think its a bit more logic to have it at the "visual-things" so you do not have to change dirs and you won't forget to change it in the process´;) also you could change the favicon simply by changing the skin. isnt the favicon part of the the ci/cd/skin you wish to create? so why not putting it simply in that folder... would put more order in the root dir too btw. just an idea... URL shortener: <a href="http://bbm.li/!7AD5C7">http://bbm.li/!7AD5C7</a>
|
Trustmaster |
|
---|---|
Sounds reasonable to me
May the Source be with you!
|
medar |
|
---|---|
Agree to put by default favicon.ico into skin folder
rangjungyeshe.ru
|
biro |
|
---|---|
I thought favicon.ico is in the root?
Be sure to check out<br /><br /><br />
My site-<a href="http://www.iso-center.co.cc">http://www.iso-center.co.cc</a><br /> My plugins;TPL Editior 1.2 & Mobile site |
Sergeich |
|
---|---|
favicon.ico a unique identifier of the site. This is not identifier of the skin. I do not agree with this idea.
|
Lombi |
|
---|---|
-1 to this idea, you can do that by yourself, not commit to the whole CMS. A myriad of browsers automatically check for favicon.ico on the root of the domain, which would result in hundreds of 404 errors daily even on the sites that noone visits.
<a href="http://www.domenlo.com">Surreal Art</a>
|
Brock |
|
---|---|
Yeah, this isn't a good idea. As Sergeich said, it's a symbol of your site, not a skin file. A company's not going to change their logo for every skin, they're going to keep the same logo, just change the looks of the template.
Web Design Database - www.wddb.com
|
Sergey |
|
---|---|
www.cotonti.mobi
|
NovoKain |
|
---|---|
Look at WordPress
|
FocusEnterprise |
|
---|---|
why not just put a tag like this
[link rel="shortcut icon" href="{HEADER_TOPLINE}" /] Replace [] with <> it works as i have it on my site, works better and can change it easer[/] |
urlkiller |
|
---|---|
now that iam aware of the autocheck i pull back my idea.
seems more logic to let it in the root. otherwise i would suggest my old idea. URL shortener: <a href="http://bbm.li/!7AD5C7">http://bbm.li/!7AD5C7</a>
|
Trustmaster |
|
---|---|
As a conclusion I would like to say:
[list=1] May the Source be with you!
|