kripteks |
|
---|---|
Can you say the difference between the template seditio/cotonti
kripteks();
|
pieter |
|
---|---|
There are some different tags that need to be included.
eg.: - The tagcloud (Change in index, forums, pages, ...) - Tags for polls are changed. - .... ... can we help you ...
|
musiconly |
|
---|---|
you're probably aiming on tags.
Well, check out the sed-light skin for new tags. Probably the biggest change is for sub-forums, so check out the forum.sections.tpl and forum.topics.tpl |
oc |
|
---|---|
Some others: user profile section (theme, password change, email change) user extra fields are new.. there are some differences in forum topics (viewers).. all forums and pages / structure there are rss tags.. (these are that i remember now, there may be others)
ps. subforums are not that much of a change. |
musiconly |
|
---|---|
|
oc |
|
---|---|
Not in way of affection, the count of new tags.
|
kripteks |
|
---|---|
I was talking about big differences template, not tags(simple tags)
(Advantage, disadvantage, stability, speed..) kripteks();
|
Cadet |
|
---|---|
Would it be possible to generate a tags list like on neocrome ?
http://www.neocrome.net/plug.php?e=sedt may not be what kripteks is after, but im sure others would find it useful (just a suggestion) Cadet |
Kilandor |
|
---|---|
Yea, I plan on making a nice plugin for that.
I just haven't got around to it. # kripteks : I was talking about big differences template, not tags(simple tags) The differences can be found really in this article. It covers alot of them http://www.cotonti.com/news/announce/cotonti_002_released |
|
This post was edited by Kilandor (2009-02-17 14:53, 15 years ago) |
DemptD |
|
---|---|
So skins made for Seditio can be used on Cotonti and just add the new tags?
|
Kilandor |
|
---|---|
Yes, just make the upgrades for new tags, and a couple tag removals I think, and the skin will work just fine.
|
DemptD |
|
---|---|
# Kilandor : Yes, just make the upgrades for new tags, and a couple tag removals I think, and the skin will work just fine. Ok, good ![]() |