<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rss version='2.0'>
	<channel>
		<title>cotonti.com : User Extra Fields improvements</title>
		<link>https://www.cotonti.com</link>
		<description>Останні повідомлення в темі</description>
		<generator>Cotonti</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 12:04:36 -0000</pubDate>

		<item>
			<title>Trustmaster</title>
			<description><![CDATA[I'd call the ability to remove standard fields a bug which needs to be fixed.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Вт, 03 Бер 2009 18:46:28 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/ua/forums?m=posts&q=2274&d=0#post9278]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>simplex</title>
			<description><![CDATA[After using the new extra fields feature in Contonti, which i think is great, i came across one problem.<br />
<br />
You can delete standard fields from the user table, such as user_name. Not understanding how this worked at first I played around with it. But i created an extra field called user_name, i might have got a warning about this im not sure. Then after messing about I deleted all the extra fields and started again, in the process deleting the &quot;user_name&quot; field from the user table!! Not the greatest thing to do, but this was on a test database.<br />
<br />
As i see it i dont think a user should be able to create new (extra) tables that are named the same as the standard fields such as user_name, user_email, user_gender, user_icq etc ... This would stop the deletion of &quot;standard&quot; fields that are needed. Obviously you dont want to stop users from deleted extra fields but checking them before creation would stop this problem.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Вт, 03 Бер 2009 11:41:29 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/ua/forums?m=posts&q=2274&d=0#post9264]]></link>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>