https://www.cotonti.com Laatste forum onderwerpen Cotonti en Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:32:06 -0000
However it removes 1 TPL file, the links can just then be placed into core TPL. And maybe add a few lang strings.

Updater code thats in adminqv, will end up being moved to a different plugin, or i'll likely just make it core.]]> Zo, 08 Nov 2009 13:48:56 -0000 It generally is just a bunch off links with good info about the system, I never used
it before, but maybe I will in the future

Pro's:
Everybody probably leaves this plugin running by default installation, If this is the case then just put it standard in the core.. (this is a valid reason to start with).

Con's:
If you want to strip cotonti down the the bare minumum, then it is easier if it stays a plugin.
This way just uninstall it. This is usefull too...

Remark:
I know some CMS systems that has a lot off extra bagage (fat) because everything is just installed and those systems get hard to maintain / develop in as they grow... They usually get slower when they grow.

Hope Cotonti stays a clean, mean CMF machine...
So just let adminqv a plugin IF it doesn't matter too much in the speed...


Give me ONE very good reason to put this in the core... (I really don't know, so I am not voting)]]> Zo, 08 Nov 2009 03:26:59 -0000 In all honesty, Cotonti is a VERY streamlined cms.
It's stable, reliable and I'm 100% happy with it!
My guess is, that if adminqv is moved to core, Cotonti will be even more streamlined
And, taking the speed that it has now, it can only be faster ]]> Zo, 08 Nov 2009 01:10:47 -0000
Except the one's from Kort?]]> Za, 07 Nov 2009 23:39:15 -0000 Za, 07 Nov 2009 21:41:37 -0000 Yes because I fully agree with Kort.

Please if you are voting No pleas write why]]> Za, 07 Nov 2009 06:42:27 -0000 Pros:
- 1 plugin less
- easy removal (just edit tpl-file)
- simplified html-coding of the admin homepage
Contras:
none!]]> Za, 07 Nov 2009 06:01:38 -0000 Za, 07 Nov 2009 05:48:12 -0000 Za, 07 Nov 2009 05:40:53 -0000