esclkm |
|
---|---|
In the LDU groups was fictitiously, user can add his own private groups. were open groups
In Seditio it was removed. Every seditio group was it own rights. I think some times it is not good. For example on my site: more 150 categories, 20 sections in the forum, 60 plugins, 20 groups, although the rights table only different in 5 groups. Calculate: 20x230-5x230 = 4600-1150 = 3450 blank SQL entries, which are not needed in the database, which will not be used. Proposal: Add additional field to the database "group type": normal, "rightsfree" or group that created by users Admins, Developers, Designers - please write your opinion littledev.ru - мой маленький зарождающийся блог о котонти.
снижение стоимости программирования и снижение стоимости производства разные вещи. Первое можно скорее сравнить с раздачей работникам дешевых инструментов, чем со снижением зарплаты |
|
Bu gönderi esclkm tarafından düzenlendi (2009-02-14 22:51, 16 yıllar önce) |
Trustmaster |
|
---|---|
Yes, I think this would save a lot of space in sed_auth table, because on large sites there are a lot of groups which are added for "Status", not for permissions.
May the Source be with you!
|
GHengeveld |
|
---|---|
This could be implemented in combination with this hack, as Trustmaster pointed out.
This hack adds grp_type to the sed_groups table, with possible values of 'both' and 'sub'. If set to 'sub', this group can only be set as a subgroup (not main). It shouln't be too hard to add the option 'rightsfree' (or similar) for groups which don't require a sed_auth row. |