Форумы / Cotonti / Extensions / [CONVERSION] UserGallery 2.40 - TOPIC FOR DELETION

For cotonti 0.6.8 there is a change in "pfs.inc.php"
This mean the file pfs.inc.php in de plugin-files will be overwritten.

Tensh, can you update the plugin-zip?

Changes to be made in file in zip-file:

http://trac.cotonti.com/changeset/1228/branches/genoa/system/core/pfs/pfs.inc.php

uhm, lol. Iam creations and thus the original author of that plugin.
i have developed the original usergal

alex was developing only version 2.4, with my ok, all other versions are still my copyright (he was fixing bugs here and there because of the lack of time on my side. if i have the site back up you could check the changelog also...)

and btw saatan is not online anymore. its not online since a couple of years now... funny.
if you would have checked the original post on neocrome you would have saw that the url is not saatan anymore its the above mentioned url.

so please change the copyright info!

if someone may be interessted here is the complete list of ALL releases versions, even the newer ones (yes you are using an very very old obsolete version of that plugin.):

Orig Post: http://neocrome.net/forums.php?m=posts&q=20855
Update Post here: http://neocrome.net/forums.php?m=posts&q=23721


uhm. yes another question i can't really remember giving you the permission to converse the plugin, did i?

ah btw. since you are polish maybe you can read the kyrilic text here: http://www.neocrome.ru/page.php?id=254

Instead of all this copyrights battle it would be better a competition in making the best gallery plugin for Cotonti.
Many websites are still using Usergallery 2.40 version (cause is the only one has mantained category structure that - imho - is the best solution compared with folder/tags one, like 3.xx versions).
I also personally converted Usergal 2.40 from Seditio to Cotonti form MY SITE (without comments and rating cause I found many problems in those parts) cause I absolutely needed it and you had taken another way than Cotonti some months ago.
It's very annoying having to restart coding everything when CMF changes.
This is the reason why I'm seriously thinking of leaving Cotonti due to the continuous change in core API and other parts elsewhere.

To tell you the truth I don't like this copyright war. Converting an old umnaintained branch is not a big fault if there is no official version available. If Max's name is missing in copyrights, that's very easy to fix.

So please, urlkiller, let us know your decision: whether you want your name in copyrights and this old version to be maintained for people who want a gallery that just works, or you want it to be removed so nobody can use any version of usergallery until you make an official version for Cotonti?

Q: What does this gallery do ??? (I have never tried it, because it appeared to be unfinished...)

That was one off the reasons I created EZGallery in the first place. I felt a gallery was missing in Cotonti.

gr, EZ

UserGallery 2.40 was great because you could create category structure and assign every user folder to the category you wanted (next newer version of UserGallery didn't permit that).
In addiction, many old Seditio websites (like mine) had that UserGallery version installed.
So, that was the reason I personally ported the plugin when I switched to Cotonti...

Now I think a good gallery system for Cotonti would have perfect integration with Cotonti PFS (that is also still so immature) and the use of last jQuery tricks. But a must have is the CATEGORY STRUCTURE, elsewhere we'll have a million-folders gallery

How were these categories created ?
Were are they comming from, for folders this is not standard ?
(I hate corehacking... sometimes it is needed, but I will avoid it)

In this plug the categories were predefined (in a setup ? ) or could anyone make a category ???