<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rss version='2.0'>
	<channel>
		<title>cotonti.com : A bug with PFS</title>
		<link>https://www.cotonti.com</link>
		<description>Last topic posts</description>
		<generator>Cotonti</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 20:25:58 -0000</pubDate>

		<item>
			<title>SunChase</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok.How about this:<br />
<br />
The PFS menu has general folders like Pictures,audio,video and ect.<br />
When a person just uploads a picture or something it will automaticaly(depending on the type) will be stored to one of this folders.<br />
<br />
Each of this general folders have they'r unique style and formation.For example:<br />
<br />
Folder &quot;Pictures&quot;.<br />
Columns:Thumbnail(with an actual picture),Full file(link and name to the full version of the file),Width\height,size,format(jpg,png,bmp),Action buttons(Delete,Rename,mb button to re-generate the thumbnail with other height\width)<br />
<br />
Why thumbnail and full file together?Cause it will be more easier to user to just push on the thumbnail istead of scrolling and looking for the button(insert as thumbnail)<br />
<br />
In this folder a person can easelly create other folders(which will have the same design as &quot;Pictures&quot;)<br />
<br />
Folder &quot;Audio&quot;.<br />
Columns:Name,ID3 tag,Duration,Format,Actions(delete,rename,post as link,post as player)<br />
<br />
Folder &quot;Temp&quot;.<br />
In these folder are stored files,which could be deleted automaticaly after a defined by user period of time.<br />
<br />
<br />
When uploading a file the user will have the next choise(Upload automaticaly,Upload to specific folder,Upload to Temp)<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks to this the user will have more organised and optimised sorounding,in which he will spend less time find something.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:31:24 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13159]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GHengeveld</title>
			<description><![CDATA[It probably will, but that depends on the way it is implemented.<br />
If you have any good ideas for the PFS please post them in <a href="http://www.cotonti.com/forums.php?m=posts&amp;q=2657">this</a> topic.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:33:32 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13152]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SunChase</title>
			<description><![CDATA[hm.But will it work with Thumbnail viewer plugin?]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:10:08 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13142]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GHengeveld</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Your problem is exactly the reason for considering on-the-fly thumbnail generation. What I have in mind is very much like <a href="http://shiftingpixel.com/2008/03/03/smart-image-resizer/" rel="nofollow">this</a> script. It will allow you to set a width, height and aspect ratio for each thumbnail individually.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:05:49 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13141]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SunChase</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><a href="https://www.cotonti.com/forums.php?m=posts&amp;p=13127#13127">#</a> <strong>Koradhil :</strong>
How about on-the-fly thumbnail generation (with cache ofcourse)?<br />
</blockquote>
<br />
hm.I dont really know what it shall be, but sound's good.<br />
<br />
If you need some ideas for the PFS i can help alitle.<br />
<br />
1.There is an option in the PFS configuration(priority field on creating thumbnails:height\width)<br />
in which i can only choose Height or Width.Can there be some middle choise.I mean - The thumbnail is first checked on width and than on height.<br />
<br />
I'll try to explain why this is needed on my situation.<br />
Using news mod i put out on the main page the articles with the thumbnails of the pictures.<br />
By default i use 600x400px on thumbnails.If i upload a piture with 1000 width and 500height and set in the PFS's config &quot;height&quot; it will shrink the picture only to suit the height's limit and shrink the image to aprocsimately 900x400.This will make a problem.And using &quot;width&quot; parameter i'll still get a bad result.<br />
<br />
2.The PFS inside isnt so convinient.But i think this thing i'll solve by myself.<br />
<br />
if you need more ideas on PFS PM me.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:00:30 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13138]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GHengeveld</title>
			<description><![CDATA[This is not a PFS bug, it is related to the script you're using to resize images on the fly.<br />
But thanks for giving me this heads-up, I got some great new ideas for the new PFS system now. How about on-the-fly thumbnail generation (with cache ofcourse)?]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:57:30 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13127]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SunChase</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi.Could some one tell me how to fix the next bug:<br />
<br />
In my site i'm using big thumbnail's of the pictures with the jQuery plugin(like on this forum)<br />
The parameters of the thumbnails are aprocsimately: 600x400px<br />
<br />
On this i found the next problem:<br />
<br />
If i upload a picture with 1000x600px parameters it generates a thumbnail with the defined settings.<br />
<span style="text-decoration:underline">But</span> if i upload a picture with 300x200px is still generates a thumbnail with the defined parameters loosing the quality of the picture.<br />
<br />
Is there some way to fix this?]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:15:54 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/forums?m=posts&q=2842&d=0#post13126]]></link>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>