Reduced thumbnail generation functionality

Hodges	#37360 2013-04-04 13:00
Members	Thank you for your replies. I am aware of Attach2, however, I have not had chance to use it. What I like about PFS is the Site File Space where all the media content of the site could be administrated from one place. And insertion of content from the SFS to a page is straight-forward enough, so I wouldn't dismiss PFS as being legacy - I think Attach2 and PFS cater for different uses. I guess my question is more general that I had originally intended: Will PFS be developed further in future releases or is it truly 'legacy' and its use deprecated until competing file management solutions make it obsolete? My only (current) issues with PFS are: Thumbnails (see above) [enhancement] File Size Inconsistencies (see https://github.com/Cotonti/Cotonti/issues/1181) [bug] Ability to transfer files from individual users' PFS to SFS, et vice versa. [feature]

Hodges

#37360 2013-04-04 13:00

Thank you for your replies. I am aware of Attach2, however, I have not had chance to use it.

What I like about PFS is the Site File Space where all the media content of the site could be administrated from one place. And insertion of content from the SFS to a page is straight-forward enough, so I wouldn't dismiss PFS as being legacy - I think Attach2 and PFS cater for different uses.

I guess my question is more general that I had originally intended: Will PFS be developed further in future releases or is it truly 'legacy' and its use deprecated until competing file management solutions make it obsolete?

My only (current) issues with PFS are:

Thumbnails (see above) [enhancement]
File Size Inconsistencies (see https://github.com/Cotonti/Cotonti/issues/1181) [bug]
Ability to transfer files from individual users' PFS to SFS, et vice versa. [feature]