<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rss version='2.0'>
	<channel>
		<title>cotonti.com : Improve robots.txt</title>
		<link>https://www.cotonti.com</link>
		<description>Neueste Themenbeiträge</description>
		<generator>Cotonti</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:31:33 -0000</pubDate>

		<item>
			<title>Trustmaster</title>
			<description><![CDATA[So, just using the <a href="http://www.cotonti.com/downloads/plugins/statistics/sitemap_plugin">Sitemap plugin</a> is a better idea, isn't it?]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mo, 12 Apr 2010 21:24:24 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/de/forums?m=posts&q=5315&d=0#post24063]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lombi</title>
			<description><![CDATA[The main thing missing here is the fact that we need to link to the sitemap file (if it exists).<br />
<br />
Apart from that there is no indexing benefits inside of robots.txt]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mo, 12 Apr 2010 20:14:33 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/de/forums?m=posts&q=5315&d=0#post24062]]></link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Trustmaster</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Cotonti comes with <em>robots.txt</em> file, but it's actually a very poor one:<br />
<pre class="code">User-agent: *
Disallow: /datas
Disallow: /images
Disallow: /js
Disallow: /skins</pre>
<br />
I think we should provide much more advanced <em>robots.txt</em> file, so Cotonti will be indexed better, especially for those who don't edit this file themselves.<br />
<br />
So, if you are familiar with <em>robots.txt</em>, feel free to post your snippets, comments and advice here to help us with it.<br /><br /><b>Added 52 days later:</b><br /><br />Bump! Really nobody has dealt with <em>robots.txt</em>?]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fr, 19 Feb 2010 01:24:48 -0000</pubDate>
			<link><![CDATA[https://www.cotonti.com/de/forums?m=posts&q=5315&d=0#post23029]]></link>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>